admin has updated page "About"
admin has updated page "About"
admin has updated page "About"
admin has updated page "About"
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on Why Liberals Should Support Michigan Governor Rick Snyder :
This is in response to the overwhelming feedback I got from TPC readers through social media and emails. (Sorry, I had to disable the comments for members. The spammers were overwhelming. I'll permit comments again as soon as I add a feature to distinguish between real members and spammers.)
Most of you asked, “Isn’t Snyder a union buster and where is the pragmatism?” Below is my response.
“Political rhetoric is one thing. Facts are another.” - Sally Kohn
The political rhetoric coming from partisan activists like Rachel Maddow is that Rick Snyder is a union busting, far right conservative. But the facts are different. Snyder has opposed and stopped overwhelming Republican majorities in both houses of the legislature from moving forward on “Right to Work” legislation and laws challenging the collective bargaining rights of public employees. That is not union busting.
In addition, he has met with leaders from more than 15 unions to seek their input and support. As he likes to say, “This is not Wisconsin.” Snyder does not employ the scorched earth tactics that his Republican counterpart Governor Scott Walker uses to pass his agenda. Even union leader David Hecker of the American Federation of Teachers has said “We're going to be able to have a dialogue with this administration.”
This aversion to confrontation is characteristically Snyder. Since taking office he has approached each issue with an open minded, consensus seeking attitude. Most of his policies may seem extremely conservative but in a time of deficits, debt, and austerity he is doing what must be done at this time in Michigan’s history. That’s pragmatic. We can definitely argue on how he divided the costs and sacrifice of budget cuts among the poor and wealthy. But I think that would take another whole essay.
As for pragmatism, Snyder is also known to pick and choose policies across the political spectrum overlooking the partisan and ideological nature of them. Take for example Snyder’s stance on “out of district students.” In his education message he said “Resident students in every school district should have the first choice to enroll, but no longer should school districts be allowed to opt out from accepting out-of-district students.”
It’s hard to imagine even a hard core progressive advocating for local school districts like Birmingham to allow students from Detroit to attend their schools. This is just one example of Snyder’s pragmatic solutions that defy partisan and ideological labels.
Furthermore, Snyder is committed to creating smart government. Nothing defines pragmatism more than smart government.
Smart government or as Snyder calls it, customer service government, is government that acts like a business relying on metrics; it is lean, effective and efficient. Its policies are not determined by ideology. Rather, policies are determined by what is in the best interest of the bottom line, the middle class. It cuts where we can and invests where we need. It invests in creating an environment for a vibrant economy and a good quality of life. Smart government focuses on creating cradle to grave opportunity, not welfare. It fosters innovation in all aspects of society, from government to the private sector. It is not an enemy but rather our partner in helping to create businesses, jobs, and a robust middle class. Smart government is smart. That’s pragmatism.
admin has updated page "About"
haodenden1h4 replied on The Israel Crisis and the Global Response.:
Thanks due to this document! Nonetheless, I needed problems seeing this informative article with Safari Your five. Simply wanted to take this in your awareness! Thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
These sterling silver cross pendant|sterling silver rings|sterling silver ring|silver rings|thai silver jewelry continue to entirely sellers every year and every season. Each have their own individual characteristics. Choose between different varieties such as blue, pink, brown and black, leather and plastic, etc
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on Republicans continue to promote a failed ideology :
Obviously not. But who promotes Marxism these days. That was discredited decades ago.
lyndahakv replied on Politics stops Nobel Prize Winner from working for his country:
scratch card saracenic primordially 888 poker Canyon Cornstalk Good video games cotyledonous numerically USA casinos online Alumnae tuneup
lloydsiky replied on Why is MI Governor Rick Snyder still considered a moderate? :
MassageGirls 18 onondaga sloppiness Daredorm pansy sicker Mysexylife aliter Cyclotron Porn Pros Network insets pulsate
admin has updated page "About"
lyndahakv replied on Why is MI Governor Rick Snyder still considered a moderate? :
MaleExtra Duckbill lith ProExtender paraphimosis Dictatorial Discount prosolution Amid mask Bought two sizegenetics devices serviceable Copse
jmp1024 replied on How do I define myself politically? :
I could not have describe myself any more accurately. I am a loyal Democratic, but I feel that the party is three groups united by a common name. We have the progressives, the conservative democrats and the third way centrist part. This is a way for Democrats like myself to define themselves to other Democrats. It is my goal to work towards a Democratic Party that sees the world the way we do.
admin has updated page "About"
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on What is a centrist and what is the centrist ideology? :
How do I define myself politically? http://www.thepragmaticcenter.com/essay/how-do-i-define-myself-politically
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on How do I define myself politically? :
Good point. But what I'm trying to do here is not just define myself politically but to also define moderates.
One of the biggest problems moderates have is that we do not know how to define ourselves. Conservatives are for small government, less taxes, and free trade. Progressives are for making the government work for everyone not just the rich. What do moderates stand for? No one really knows...And that will not help us win any elections.
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on The Pragmatic Center’s involvement in the Coffee Party schism:
No, those are just generic Google ads. You pick a topic - politics, and that's what we got.
RobBenjamin replied on Why Marco Rubio will be the Republican Vice Presidential Candidate in 2012:
I disagree. As a group, Hispanics are not any stupider than the rest of the population. They would have to be in order to not recognize the deep, malignant anti-Hispanic racism now rampant in the Republican Party. Of course, some ARE stupider, and even likely to identify with that racism. Republicans are counting on ethnic solidarity with a candidate whose basic values and positions are increasingly out of touch with Hispanic voters, especially those who are primarily English speakers.
Look at recent polls and you will see the growing political and cultural divide between those whose primary language is English and those whose primary language is Spanish. Not so different from the history of other ethnic groups.
"Hispanic" is not a one-size fits all label. To treat it as such is to ignore the deep, often hostile cultural and political divides between groups from different Spanish-speaking countries. Some of this reflects local inter-ethnic turf wars, such as the disconnect between Cuban-Americans in Miami-Dade and other local Hispanic groups. But some goes a lot deeper. Just listen to what many Cuban-Americans, Mexican-Americans, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, and others have to say about each other and you might get a dose of a very different reality.
If I were Hispanic (which it turns out I am, in part), I would no more vote for Marco Rubio than I would for my fellow Jew, Eric Cantor. The reason? When I decide whom to vote for, I put ethical and political values first, and ethnic identity dead last. I suspect that most pragmatists do the same, and that that includes most Hispanics.
On the other hand, I really hope that any Republicans reading this decide that I have no idea what I am talking about and stay the course all the way over a cliff.
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on Why Marco Rubio will be the Republican Vice Presidential Candidate in 2012:
In addition I failed to mention that Marco Rubio would solidifiy Tea Partiers support around the Republican nominee. That would definitely be essential if the nominee is Romney.
Moreover, the issue of the Hispanic vote would not be so influential if the president was someone other than Obama. That is part of the reason why the Hispanic vote has become more influential earlier than expected. Most presidential elections are between candidates splitting the white vote; therefore, somewhat minimizing the impact of minorities. However, since Obama is the incumbent the equation has changed and the impact of the Hispanic vote is even more significant.
As for Rubio he has all of the advantages that a nominee looks for in a VP pick.
1. From swing state - FL; with a large number of electoral votes
2. Solidifies the party
3. Increases tent - Hispanics
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on Moderates: What Is Our Brand? :
I completely agree with you. Thank you for the comment! You may be interested in this essay also:
"Practical is not Political"http://www.thepragmaticcenter.com/essay/practical-not-political
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on 2/3 of American corporations pay no taxes: 2 Videos & Article :
Last week The New York Times revealed that America's largest corporation GE pays no taxes. To read more on this topic click HERE!
Dividist replied on Cut Where We Can, Invest Where We Need :
The recent comprehensive Mary Meeker report is a great place to start for anyone who wants to do a deep dive into the state of the financial crisis facing this country. She takes a similar approach to what Nicholas advocates here, Spending must be slashed, unfunded entitlement liabilities must be reduced dramatically, and revenue must be raised. Yes, tax rates on the rich must go up, tax loopholes must close, and the tax base must also be broadened. Meeker actually advocates increases in Infrastructure, Education and Defense spending while slashing entitlements.
I take a different view, and am much more in the camp of an equal opportunity hatchet man. Everything must be cut. Anon's ridiculous comments above to the contrary, we're very few years away from a crisis that will make the last recession look like the good old days if we don't get our act together now.
It's not me saying that - look at the comment of the President's commission on Deficit Reduction, or the forward to the Meeker report written by Michael Bloomberg, George Schultz. and Paul Volcker. Don't kid yourself, we've got a real problem and are right on the brink of it getting away from us in a big way.
One of the stunning findings in the report is that in 15 years it'll take all the revenues of the US government to pay just for entitlements and interest on the debt. With optimistic assumptions. Of course, we'll never get to that point. Either we take serious action to fix it now, or sometime between now and then the stuff is going to really hit the fan, and the cuts will solve themselves. It won't be pretty.
Check it out:
http://westanddivided.blogspot.com/2011/03/read-em-and-weep-usa-all-in-w...
Nicholas R. Goebel replied on Moderates Need Institutional Structure:
Thanks for the comment!
I completely agree with you. We should focus on political reforms such as primary reform and redistricting reform. I think those should be our top two priorities.
There was a great op-ed in POLITICO recently. http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=4EF3D329-AAD4-430E-82A7A18A9940F538
Please keep in touch and let me know how we can collaborate more.
Thanks.
admin has updated page "About"
coach1640280 replied on What Obama Should Have Said to O’Reilly:
Eight elephants are in line for government "crisis mode" response: war, immigration, ecology, recession, foreclosure, joblessness, tax, and debt.
Our government is in "crisis mode" since about 1830, reacting to everything, planning nothing.
The Obama administration is no exception.
http://wp.me/s1fQnO-start
| Calmoderate 5 weeks ago |
| dresses 6 weeks ago |
| louisstore 9 weeks ago |
| cheappumps 10 weeks ago |
| christiandorsay 10 weeks ago |
| beachbeach 11 weeks ago |
| Jagged Centrist 12 weeks ago |
| Jagged Centrist 12 weeks ago |
| discountlondon 12 weeks ago |
| cystalyarn 12 weeks ago |
| rolexwatches 12 weeks ago |
| discountbelstaf 12 weeks ago |
| cheapoutlet 12 weeks ago |
| canadaclothes 12 weeks ago |
| eternaporsche 12 weeks ago |
